Homelessness

Homelessness Board begins search for new executive director

Written by Brian Bohnert | | bbohnert@toledofreepress.com

Amid new federal regulations for area homeless shelters, the Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board has started a search committee to replace its current director.

Deb Conklin, executive director of TLCHB, said she met with the board last year and discussed the development of a succession plan for when she was ready to depart from the position.

“This has been in the works for a year,” Conklin said. “When I came in, it was understood that I was not going to be there forever.”

Conklin was hired in 2005 under a contract that called for “half-time” work. As new legislation was presented and responsibilities grew, she said the demand of the position began overwhelming her full-time job as pastor of Peace Lutheran Church in Bowling Green.

“How long does an organization pay a full-time person for a half-time salary?” she said. “The work of the board requires a lot. Leading our community to end homelessness means being there full time. It means that crazy kind of full time where you work 60 to 70 hours a week.”

The search committee is in charge of finding the best available candidate to take over the executive director position once Conklin retires. The committee is being led by Joe Tafelski, executive director of Advocates for Basic Legal Equality, Inc. (ABLE). Margaret Miracola, director of Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority and member of TLCHB is also on the committee, among others.

Paul Tecpanecatl, TLCHB president, said the decision to replace Conklin does not represent the work she has done on the board.

“Deb’s done great work but we’ve been burdening her with a lot of full-time work,” Tecpanecatl said. “She’s very dedicated to ending homelessness, but she’s been burning the candle at both ends.”

TLCHB has taken this opportunity to revise the position by evaluating funding and developing an up-to-date job description. Tecpanecatl said the new director must be dedicated to helping the board administer new U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations for the new Continuum of Care program developed under the HEARTH Act.

These new regulations include emergency homeless prevention programs and rapid rehousing, among others, Tecpanecatl said. These regulations were enacted by Congress in June

While there is no current timetable set for the process, Tecpanecatl said the idea is to have everything completed by the end of the first quarter of next year.

“We’re looking at the financial resources and the new requirements of the Continuum of Care (CoC) legislation. We’re also going to take a look at what other communities are doing,” Tecpanecatl said. “We want to do this right.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

Toledo City Council

Shelter directors speak out at city council hearing on funding

Written by Brian Bohnert | | bbohnert@toledofreepress.com

In a June 13 public hearing, directors of area homeless shelters expressed concern to city council over the threat of looming budget cuts to their agencies.

Councilmembers presented some legislation but put the discussion on hold in the interest of time after about two hours.

The city released Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) recommendations last week and the results marred the hopes that any shelter directors had of making up for lost funding they incurred from prior cuts.

The homeless shelters, including the Aurora House, Family House, Bethany House, the Harbor House and La Posada Family Shelter, learned about two months ago that they would no longer receive Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). Many of these shelters have depended on this money for decades. The Aurora House, a rehabilitative transitional housing program, used CDBG funding for at least 12 percent of its budget.

Now, staff and directors of the local shelters have nearly two weeks to create a new budget and find a solution to their problems. The new budget cycle starts at the beginning of July.

Renee Palacios, executive director of the Family House, said the proposed cuts would eliminate 12 percent from their total budget, around $85,000.

With the fiscal year ending on June 30, Palacios said there is not a lot of time.

“We have had emergency meetings to find where $85,000 can be cut and we’ve put three things on the chopping block,” Palacios said. “We’ve put feeding our residents, security and transportation for children to our daycare all on the chopping block. When you’re talking 12 percent in 11 days, you have to make some pretty rash decisions.”

Lourdes Santiago, director of the Department of Neighborhoods, spoke before council. She said the city review panel did not grant some agencies CDBG funding because they were eligible to receive ESG funding while other agencies were not.

Dino Peluso, board president for the Family House, was outraged at the proposed cuts. He, like many at local shelters, was under the impression that the CDBG money lost would be restored by ESG funding.

“What makes me so upset is that, between CDBG and ESG, they cut 12 percent of my budget and then they keep telling me it’s going to be alright,” Peluso said. “They expect us to up our service to the homeless but I don’t understand how we can do that with less money.”

The Family House provides 37,000 meals a year to its residents.

Both Peluso and Palacios expressed their concerns when speaking to the council at the hearing.

“We have a community at the Family House that is at the worst moments of their lives losing their shelter. Now, they have to worry about losing their food,” Peluso said. “We want to be on the forefront of homelessness. We want to be the voice of the people. But it’s hard to be the voice of the people with 13 percent less money.”

If the funding is not restored, Peluso said that the Family House, as well as other local shelters, could face a hard and bleak future.

“What happens if, at the end of the day, Family House has to close?” he said. “Out of the 137 beds in area homeless shelters, we have 90. Yet, it seems fit to cut 100 percent of our CDBG funds. We’re asking for help. Our organization is at its end if something doesn’t change.”

While speaking in front of council at the hearing, Jennifer Flory, a Family House resident, addressed the issue of rapid rehousing — a method that county shelters are being asked to pursue.

For Flory’s daughter, 9-year-old Jaylyn, rapid rehousing would not be good as she has ADHD, epilepsy and a form of autism, Flory said.

“Rapid rehousing is not good for us,” Flory said. “It would not be safe for us to move an autistic child around so much.”

Many other shelter residents spoke in front of council, telling their stories and pleading with the city to make a well-informed decision as to where money needs to go.

“This should not be about how many shelters there are,” said Ken Leslie, founder of 1Matters and former Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board member. “If the Family House closes, where will people go?”

City Council has the ultimate decision, one it will reach by the end of June.

“Homelessness really is a complex issue,” said City Council President Joe McNamara. “There is no one-size-fits-all solution to homelessness. All I can say is that I think everyone in this room has the common goal to end homelessness.”

Councilman D. Michael Collins introduced a proposed amendment to the ESG recommendations that would reduce funds to other local agencies by 10 percent in order to gently guide the shelters into the fiscal transition.

“This is a one-time fix. It gives the organizations and the city of Toledo a year to come up with a better way of addressing HUD’s changing priorities and the Department of Neighborhoods policies,” Collins said.

Council will have another hearing to discuss additional proposed legislation.

Denise Fox, executive director of the Aurora House, addressed council on the unexpected news of the funding cuts, urging them to make the decision about what is best for the people needing the services.

“When we first started [the fiscal year], Aurora attended a meeting for CDBG like usual. We became aware that Toledo suffered a 3 percent cut of funding,” Fox said. “As an agency, we have received those funds for over 20 years and we fall under eligible CDBG services.”

When it comes to reducing the length of time a resident can stay at the Aurora House, Fox said rapid rehousing is not the best option.

The Aurora House, which specializes in helping women and their children, often houses their residents for extended periods of time. The prospective loss of around $70,000 would likely cut the length of time a resident can stay, she said.

“As an agency, we are very much focused on long-term housing,” she said. “We are sincerely looking at a program that changes lives and you can’t do that in a short amount of time.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Economy

Homeless shelters face budget cuts, changes in systems

Written by Caitlin McGlade | | news@toledofreepress.com

By the end of the month the verdict will be in: Homeless shelters and transitional housing agencies shocked by cuts will learn whether they can make up at least some of the loss through a different funding source that would push them to rethink how they operate.

About a month ago, shelters including the Aurora House, Family House, Bethany House, the Harbor House and La Posada Family Shelter discovered they might have to do without money they have depended on for decades. The city released community development block grant (CDBG) recommendations and the shelters were not on the list.

Toledo City Council has yet to approve the recommendations.

“We’re basically a skeleton crew already,” said Kathy Griffin, executive director of Bethany House, a shelter for domestic violence victims. “We don’t have a lot of fluff.”

Ken Leslie, founder of 1Matters and former Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board member, said he is puzzled by the decision. The city’s citizen review panel and Department of Neighborhoods panel ranked Aurora House’s grant proposal the highest in quality and community need of all comparable homeless shelters.

The Bethany House also received a high ranking, along with La Posada. Family Outreach Community United Services (FOCUS), which ranked lower than these agencies, did not get cut from CDBG funding.

Lourdes Santiago, director of the Department of Neighborhoods, said the panel didn’t recommend those highly-ranked shelters for CDBG money because they could apply for Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funding. This is money sent from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that has grown while CDBG funding has shrunk.

Many of these shelters are considered transitional housing projects, meaning that their residents stay for long periods of time and complete rehabilitation processes before their release. The Aurora House, for example, can house a woman and her children for up to two years before that woman is ready to move into a dwelling on her own.

HUD spokesman Brian Sullivan said ESG funding is intended for basic emergency shelter operations, prevention, rapid rehousing and limited transitional housing needs.

Rapid Rehousing

The goal is to measure agency success in part by reducing the average length of stay among shelters that use ESG funds. Deborah Conklin, director of the Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board, said the board aims to achieve a 30-day average system-wide.

The funding shift will change how a lot of shelters do business. For the Family House, the 30-day goal is attainable but not ideal, said Renee Palacios, director of the Family House.

“Essentially, we are turning our shelter inside out,” she said.

The change is tasking her shelter to “rapidly rehouse” homeless people who enter the Family House, she said. This means that case managers must start planning an exit strategy the second someone walks in for help. Then, they would work with these individuals in their homes, as opposed to on-site, Palacios said.

People stay at the Family House for 38 days on average but the maximum time allowed is 90 days. There are people behind those numbers, Palacios said, and many of them come in with a variety of problems or ailments that must be addressed before they can move out and be successful on their own.

“People don’t come in here and pour out their hearts and souls. They don’t come in saying, ‘Yes, I’m bipolar,’” she said. “It takes weeks to get to know them to see that they’re presenting these issues and they have to accept it and accept the treatment.”

For now, when a homeless person walks through the doors, the staff gives him or her a week to adjust to shelter life before discussing rehabilitative services. Some newcomers might spend two to three days in their rooms crying. This is not the time to be forcing them out into their own apartments, Palacios said.

Recovery Time

Karen Fowler

At the Aurora House, which would lose about $74,390 in the aftermath of CDBG cuts, time could be the difference between healing and relapsing, said Denise Fox, executive director of the house. Many of the women who come in are referred by the court system or by Lucas County Children Services (LCCS). Many are addicted to drugs or alcohol.

The loss has left the Aurora House scrambling to replace 12 percent of its budget with ESG money. The shift will press the Aurora House to reduce the average stay to six months, Fox said.

Fox said this is particularly difficult to do because of the collaboration with LCCS and the court, which are not only on their own schedule, but can mandate lengths of time a woman needs to partake in rehab at the shelter.

“If we have a woman with chemical dependency, you aren’t going to get stabilized in six months; you don’t have the capabilities to start thinking clearly and making good decisions until at least six months,” Fox said. “The first year of recovery is very crucial — they are so readily susceptible to relapse.”

Karen Fowler, a 44-year-old mother, spent a few months in the Aurora House before giving up and leaving. She came back later and completed the program in eight months. She said she needed every minute of that period to recover.

She recently graduated with a certificate in Web design from Owens Community College, wielding a portfolio of site designs for a number of local agencies. She has tutored her peers in writing papers, is well versed in English literature and she keeps in tune with her guitar. She and her 11-year-old son Joshua live in a bright apartment in the Vistula district and she’s ready to take off to wherever the job market carries her.

Just six years ago she was on the brink of homelessness. Addicted to alcohol and drifting from one waitressing job to the next, Fowler could hardly turn to her parents in Perrysburg for help. She went to rehab. And then she found the Aurora House.

“I thought I’d be lucky to have a bed,” Fowler said. “But I recovered a sense of myself, a sense of what I can do. Finishing this place was probably the most important thing I’ve ever finished.”

That challenge took nearly a year of structure and authority — she had chores she was required to complete, classes she had to take and a curfew to follow. She had to designate a career goal, find ways to follow through and learn how to balance a checkbook again.

The Bethany House requires a lot of time to serve its residents, Griffin said.

The house is a safehaven for domestic violence victims. The residents stay about eight months on average, but the funding shift will push Bethany House to reduce that number to six, like the Aurora House, Griffin said.

Once a victim is moved out of the shelter, the idea is then to have services brought to them in their new homes. But Griffin said this plan does not take into consideration the fact that many of these victims need a safe hiding place from abusive partners.

Bethany House would lose about $27,412 of its $295,580 budget because of the CDBG cuts. In the past, the money has paid for a case manager.

The Harbor House, a transitional home for women with drug addictions, would lose about 5 percent of its budget through CDBG cuts. Women from as far as California come in for rehab services at the Harbor House.

“I’m just going to have to work harder for our fundraisers to make that up and reach out to corporate sponsors,” said Executive Director Donna Perras. “It’s going to be a burden on the business community absolutely because we’re going to be looking for sponsors and that’s going to trickle down to them.”

Embattled money

The embattled pot of money comes from the federal government, but decisions about how to use it are made locally, Sullivan said.

In 2010, Toledo received $8.8 million in CDBG money. This year, the city got about $6.8 million. At the same time, the ESG money increased to $610,000, compared to $353,000 a couple of years ago, Sullivan said.

The intent of the ESG boost was not to replace CDBG funding for homeless shelters, he said.

When the housing crisis struck, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act allotted $1.5 billion to a three-year program called the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program. This money was not for the chronically homeless, but was for those people who were at risk of becoming homeless. Assistance came in the form of short or medium-term rent assistance, financial help with moving expenses or checks to cover security deposits. This helped at least 1.2 million people across the country, Sullivan said.

“The upfront cost of getting into an apartment can make all the difference of somebody falling into homelessness or not,” Sullivan said.

When Congress saw that this was working, members voted to allow traditional funding from HUD to be used for prevention and rapid rehousing. So the former Emergency Shelter Grant was changed to the Emergency Solutions Grant, with money added for rapid rehousing and prevention, Sullivan said.

The homelessness board is responsible for setting the parameters for ESG funding. The board will allocate 60 percent for essential services, after administrative fees, and the remainder for housing stabilization programs.

Conklin said an overlooked fact during the ESG funding discussion is that the county now has to operate with less money to prevent homelessness because that $1.5 billion stimulus program is ending.

The board could allocate less to essential services, but no more than what it already has, she said.

The board had also applied for its own CDBG grant but the panel rejected it, citing a vague objective, undefined community need, no fund balance and incomplete financial information.

“Having residential facilities is very costly to the community,” Conklin said. “These are expensive beds at the end of the day. The system will allow us to decipher those who need it the most.”

Fox isn’t convinced. Her program spends about $10,000 on each woman.

“I don’t know of anyone who can live on $10,000 a year; that’s pretty cost effective for those women,” she said.

City council will wait for ESG recommendations before voting on the CDBG recommendations. The council has the final say.

“I’m trying to do everything I can to make sure they have funding,” said Councilman George Sarantou. “I have no interest in turning people with needs out on the street.”

Leslie said the pressure to rapid rehouse in Toledo is misguided.

“They’re all about housing first housing first, but I believe it should be housing next,” Leslie said. “If you kill the shelters, you kill the very people who use those shelters.”

Tags: , , , , , ,