Real journalism
Friday, January 22nd, 2010A poster using the pseudonym “Wolfman” asked these questions Jan. 16 in a Swampbubbles post headlined “The Propaganda Media State”: “Does a WSPD or a Toledo Free Press have the resources to do real journalism?” and “Should journalism get the next government bailout?”
Wolfman did not define specifics on “real journalism” but provided a link to a PBS.org video, “Saving American Journalism,” in which “NOW” host David Brancaccio interviews professor Bob McChesney and journalist John Nichols about the future of newspapers. The two men have authored a book, “The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again,” that raises the question about the government stepping in with tax money to save newspapers.
The two men correctly point out that massive layoffs and closings have reduced the work force and seriously hampered print media’s ability to devote resources to investigative stories. They adopt a more alarmist voice when describing what they view as the possible result of this lack of print journalism: a “Propaganda Media State” in which there are fewer independent journalistic voices. They posit that will create a void that would be filled by government and large corporations. They suggest that the move from newsrooms to Internet information will result in fewer checks and balances and a dearth of quality control.
There is no question that some blog sites are merely gossip mills or news release stenographers, but are people that easily confused and unable to distinguish news from opinion and propaganda?
McChesney and Nichols advocate government bailouts for newspapers. They refer to their philosophy as “American as apple pie” and point to examples from the Founding Fathers era in which mailing rates were suspended and other subsidies were granted newspapers to ensure the dissemination of information. They estimate it could take up to $30 billion a year for the government to keep American newspapers afloat.
I rarely respond to posts on blogs or news sites. Not because I don’t believe in them, because I do; I am an avid follower of more than a dozen local blogs and news sites. But I have learned the hard way that there is little to gain by trying to join a thread of conversation as an official representative of Toledo Free Press. For every civil and intelligent rejoinder, there are a half-dozen uninformed snipers who just want to insult and stir up trouble. If it were criticism, even criticism I judged unfair, I would be cool with it, but it puts me in a box in which I have to be professional and moderate under my real name while jousting with anonymous hit-and-run posters who have no interest in fair conversation.
Wolfman’s post caught my attention for a number of reasons, so I responded, hopefully not too defensively, that while Toledo Free Press cannot send reporters to Haiti or the Olympics, we are able to go toe-to-toe with the big boys on the stories we do cover. Toledo Free Press owned the initial coverage of the Jan. 15 state auditor’s work notes on the TPS Investigate-gate story; hours before any other media source, Toledo Free Press posted several updates and comments from some of the people involved. The majority of that research was done by Toledo Free Press contributor Lisa Renee Ward, who is the area’s leading news blogger but who is not, she is the first to say, a trained journalist.
In response to the question of whether this newspaper can provide “real journalism,” I posted an unavoidably defensive list of 16 industry awards for reporting and writing we have received since 2008.
There is no argument against the thesis that publications such as Toledo Free Press and Web sites such as Ward’s Glass City Jungle can and do provide “real journalism.” There is a legitimate question about the scope and depth of that journalism. Many people in the established traditional media bristle at the notion that small outlets such as Toledo Free Press or bloggers like Ward can compete with them. They scoff at the notion that an understaffed newsroom or a lone at-home blogger can dig as deep and write as professionally as they do. Organizations like Toledo Free Press and Glass City Jungle have to practice selective journalism in terms of the quantity of stories we cover, but there is no sacrifice in quality, although old-school journalists maintain a distinct elitism about these news sources.
That is just one reason why traditional media, specifically daily newspapers, are a dead business model lurching along, animated only by the fading momentum of tradition and the impetus of their own bloated corpses.
Wolfman apparently looks to The Blade as a source of “real journalism,” but anyone who is paying attention knows that newspaper produces occasionally outrageous examples of jaundiced reporting and writing, often committed by journalists with degrees from some of the most prestigious programs in the country. Is one shady monolith of “real journalism” preferable to a series of smaller, more accountable news sources that report fewer stories but cover them with more neutrality and collectively cover the same ground as the monolith?
The Internet has democratized journalism, to the benefit of readers and the detriment of many who earned journalism degrees and make their living. That’s a harsh reality to deal with, but the marketplace will determine future sources of news, not the old-school boys desperately clinging to an era of monopoly from 25 years ago, and definitely not the government and taxpayer dollars.
Michael S. Miller is editor in chief of Toledo Free Press. Contact him at mmiller@toledofreepress.com.








