Pop goes the world
Friday, December 18th, 2009In her Dec. 8 article “The real inconvenient truth,” published in Canada’s Financial Post newspaper, author Diane Francis declares that “a planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate.” Also crediting much of the population increase to lower infant mortality and higher life expectancy, Francis goes on to explain that “humankind has not yet recalibrated its behavior to account for the fact that the world can only accommodate so many people.”
Even among the most insistent of modern “save civilization” urgings, this one stands out to me. It stands out not just because it is an oversimplified answer to what some consider a burgeoning problem or even for what still others consider its bordering on absurdity. It stands out to me because its implementation would completely change the family dynamic we have come to know and thought we always would.
A staunch adherence to a global one-child policy would place us one generation away from the complete extinction of the roles of brother and sister and two generations away from the extinction of the roles of aunt, uncle, niece, nephew and cousin. Entire layers of the way we now relate to one another as human beings would oddly be stripped away. Would we really ever be willing to give that up?
In addition to losing part of our physical humanity, we would be at risk of losing a decent-sized chunk of our emotional humanity as well. China is facing an unprecedented gender imbalance due to its favoring of males. Countless Chinese girls have already lost their chance at life simply by carrying an extra X chromosome in a country where many parents are only given one shot at offspring and girls are not at the top of the wish list. Such a situation has led to the consistent thinning of the female population through abortion, abandonment and infanticide, paving the way for a male-heavy populace.
China does make some exceptions to its one-child policy. Included in the reasons for possibly being allowed a second child is the physical or mental disability of a first child. Essentially, this exception to the rule seems to imply that such a child doesn’t quite count. After years of gaining appreciation for the unique qualities of special needs children and pushing for their greater acceptance and integration into our society, the thought of such a step backwards in this country would be an unspeakable tragedy.
Additionally, although a strict one-child policy would mathematically result in a desired negative population growth, such a swift decline in the young, productive population would force a disproportionately large elderly population to eventually fend for themselves. Our social standard of caring for our elderly when they are no longer able would quickly become completely infeasible. So few would just have no way of supporting so many.
It is no doubt frightening to imagine a world where people literally outnumber the amount of resources necessary to sustain life. Most of us want what is best for the future of our planet and our fellow human beings. Yet, would we be willing to give up who we once were and how we once interrelated in order to save ourselves altogether? Is there any other way?
When covering this very topic in a college geography class more than a decade ago, I distinctly remember seeing video of a professor named Julian Simon, who took an interesting stance on the possibility of overpopulation, insisting that such a problem was actually not a problem at all. In stark contrast to opposing views, Simon found such merit in the human ability that he saw human population growth as a constant asset rather than a liability.
At the time, Simon’s glass-half-full optimism when it came to population numbers seemed far-fetched and even somewhat ridiculous. However, after learning our long history of failed end-of-the-world predictions and 34 years of seeing so many fizzle out first hand, I’m starting to think there may have been a method to Simon’s seeming madness.
Having three children and not being able to imagine life without any one of them , along with the fear of losing our sense of humanity in the name of humanity, I’m definitely willing to keep an open mind.
Shannon and her husband Michael are raising three children in Sylvania. Follow her blog online at http://www.WhatsWithWomen.com/ and e-mail her at letters@toledofreepress.com.









