Comments on: Candidate’s private information leaked

By: Michael Miller

Michael Miller — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:09:16 +0000

When the former Mrs. Milliken brought this to my attention, I immediately e-mailed her and told her:
1. The online references would be edited
(they have been).
2. We will run a correction in print next week.
3. I asked her to please not use my personal Facebook page for TFP business.

The former Mrs. Milliken then posted her complaint here, but it was sent to the Askimet spam filter. I found it and posted it here.

By: newshorse

newshorse — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:46:23 +0000

Michael, I am very disappointed in your editorial skills with your article describing how poor Kevin Milliken had his divorce papers leaked. As your former Managing Editor, how is it even possible that you published my maiden name without fact checking? So now, in addition to telling that our public divorce records have unredacted personal information, you go so far as to ALSO publish my maiden name (even though the name is misspelled). WOW. Not only poor editorial oversight (name and fact checking) but also very poor reporting, as the reporter MUST have gotten this information straight from Kevin Milliken’s mouth. This was a ploy for Kevin to try to get his divorce proceedings sealed, which didn’t work. And now I have been twice victimized….thanks!

By: Ty Coon

Ty Coon — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:40:45 +0000

Yeah, and duffis Barney, makes it all seem so easy.It is without a doubt,slime from the local,daily, yellow-rag,bankrupt paper,who got it from ..GUESS WHO ?? Your local clerk of records….another Demonrat !!

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:16:30 +0000

Contemptible.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:31:06 +0000

In recent times, the need to remove sensitive information from documents has become a crucial priority for county clerks across the United States.

The term ‘Redaction’ has seen a huge increase in attention lately as more and more cases which include document redaction are put into the public sector through mainstream media.

The attention has highlighted a growing requirement for organizations, the need to release information publicly whilst keeping sensitive information private and being able to release the documents with certainty that information marked for redaction has been permanently removed.

Unfortunately a lot of media attention related to redaction has come when organizations have failed to redact information properly and sensitive information has been mistakenly released.

Redaction errors are usually attributed to insufficient methods and the lack of information available in regard to document security.

There are a number of specifically designed software solutions available which eliminate common mistakes associated with out-dated redaction methods. Once such product is RapidRedact, the product’s website (www.rapidredact.com) provides a plethora of information about redaction and a free demonstration of the software.

By: Tamara

Tamara — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:15:42 +0000

This situation underlines the reason why people who would do a great job as public officals do not want to get involved in the election process.

By: meghan

meghan — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:56:49 +0000

Hmm, I wonder who could have done such a thing. I bet we find out soon….